>>"Steve" == Steve Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> Hmm. This says that the *location* of directories must comply with FHS.
Steve> Why doesn't this read simply "The Debian file system must fully comply
Steve> with FHS"? Is it intended that Debian follow the FHS only in *location*
Steve> but not in *intent* or *use* of directories? For instance, FHS allows
the
Steve> directory location /usr/lib. Can I ignore the *intent* of /usr/lib, and
Steve> put a user-executable binary in it? Or am I reading too much into this
Steve> bit of policy?
Steve> Well, let's assume that I'm reading too much into this, and that the
Steve> Policy writers really intended that Debian be fully FHS compliant.
Actually, no. We never intended full compliance when that was
written (people had major misgivings regardin /var/state, var/lib/
etc (the FHS has changed since)). There was also the issue of
/var/spool/mail ...
So the intent was that we shall try to be as compliant as
possible, without chaining ourselves the what is an evolving
standard.
We may, of course, decide to revisit that stance.
manoj
--
Change your thoughts and you change your world.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
