Chris Waters writes: > We have a *serious* problem here, IMO, and, while this proposal may > not be the best solution, we *need* a solution. I'd like to hear some > alternative proposals if this one is to be discarded.
> (cc'd to the most recent objectors in the probably vain hope that > they'll be able to put their ideas where their mouth is....) Which meant I got it twice, given I'm on -policy anyway.... I'm not sure I agree with your argument that undocumented(7) is a disincentive to write a proper manpage, but that would just be argument by repeated assertion, so I won't go there. I still maintain that undocumented(7) serves a useful function (as my objection said), but perhaps it should be reworded somewhat; maybe we should encourage people to check the BTS and submit a bug report, or simply "do submit this as a bug if there isn't an appropriate one open", since it seems that there often isn't the bug open that undocumented(7) currently says there is. Matthew -- "At least you know where you are with Microsoft." "True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." http://www.debian.org
