On Sun, 09 Jan 2000, Anand Kumria wrote: > > Who is expecting 0 here? We expect this for Debian 2.3, but not > > for potato. In potato we expect, that every documentation is > > available as /usr/doc/<package> (documentation either placed there > > or accessible via a symlink to /usr/share/doc/<package>).
> No, we expect 0 here. Do we really have to discuss this again? We asked the technical committee some time ago to decide how to smoothly migrate from /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc and the decision was that every package has to provide /usr/doc/<package> in potato (either as a directory (for old packages) or as a symlink to /usr/share/doc/<package> (for new packages)). In woody (potato+1) every package has to place its documentation in /usr/share/doc/<package> with a symlink /usr/doc/<package> pointing to /usr/share/doc/<package>. In woody+1 the symlinks have to be removed. So you have to wait until potato is released before you are allowed to write bug reports against packages, which place their documentation in a dictionary /usr/doc/<package>. Ciao Roland -- * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.spinnaker.de/ *