On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 04:04:09PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > > I don't think the last 3 lines need to remain in policy. Any issues with > > removing them? Otherwise this sounds good to me. > > Removing them changes who is responsible for that. That's worth a seperate > proposal, I think it might be too controversial to tack onto this one, which > is just documenting existing practice. > > I don't see anything wrong with the boot-floppies folks asking on -devel > before adding stuff to base.
*shrug* They don't currently, but if you think that's worth its own
proposal, this one is still good as it stands.
--
- Joseph Carter GnuPG public key: 1024D/DCF9DAB3, 2048g/3F9C2A43
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<stu> you should be afraid to use KDE because RMS might come to your
house and cleave your monitor with an axe or something :)
pgp0gedHcUxSE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
