Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 +0000 (GMT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 1999 16:01:36 +0000
Received: (qmail 21664 invoked from network); 12 Sep 1999 16:01:29 -0000
Received: from pool19.ka.ilk.de (HELO sanctum) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 12 Sep 1999 16:01:29 -0000
Received: from jae by sanctum with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11QC3u-0007vJ-00; Sun, 12 Sep 1999 18:01:06 +0200
From: "Juergen A. Erhard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PROPOSAL] handling missing stuff in /var/local
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.27
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 18:01:05 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.0.1.1
Severity: normal
Add to section 3.1.2:
/usr/local is local admin territory. Whatever the local admin
does in or below /usr/local, must not affect the operation of even
parts of a package.
Thus, no package may depend on the existence of anything
below /usr/local, even if it created the directory itself. It
may not even depend on the existence of /usr/local.
The motivation for this proposal is found in bug #44682. I then
realized (poked by Edward Betts ;-) that policy is unclear on this...
it is allowed for a package to create dirs below /usr/local, but
policy is mum about what should happen when such dirs are removed
by the admin.
Comments welcome.
Of course, rephrasings are welcome to... ;-)
Bye, J
PS: I am not (yet) a maintainer... but I gathered from past
discussions on this that anyone can make a proposal, but only
maintainers can second. (I just now read proposal.text ... but
I propose this anyway... it's necessary, so sue me >;-)
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux sanctum 2.2.12 #1 Mon Sep 6 05:43:29 CEST 1999 i686
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 44922-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 1999 21:31:45 +0000
Received: (qmail 17140 invoked from network); 6 Nov 1999 21:15:11 -0000
Received: from mserv1c.u-net.net (195.102.240.33)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 1999 21:15:11 -0000
Received: from [195.102.196.44] (helo=polya)
by mserv1c.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #35)
id 11kD9x-0005Qp-00; Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:14:05 +0000
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11kD9q-0000Vf-00; Sat, 06 Nov 1999 21:13:58 +0000
Subject: Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 +0000 (GMT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
These bugs have been fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0; changelog follows.
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Changes: debian-policy (3.1.0.0) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add instructions on /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc symlinks (closes:
#45561, #42447, #48570)
* Added source dependencies (closes: #41232)
* Deprecated /etc/rc.boot (closes: #32448, #32449)
* Update-rc.d now only legal way to automatically access /etc/rc?.d
directoried (closes: #41547)
* FHS compliant location of examples (closes: #42849)
* Added ispell-dictionary to virtual-packages.list (following new
suggestions: no objections => accept) (closes: #8221)
* Added man-browser to virtual-packages.list (closes: #24695)
* Added ident-server to virtual-packages.list (closes: #45307)
* Alphabeticised virtual packages list ;)
* Corrected GPL reference in proposal.sgml
* Clarification of "extra" priority (closes: #33076)
* Remove buggy and seriously problematic licenses from list of contrib
package criteria (closes: #45318)
* Move docs to /usr/share/doc with a compatibility symlink (closes:
#41829)
* Update to FHS 2.1 draft #3 (for /var/state etc. changes).
* Correct /var/lib/games -> /var/games (closes: #42358)
* Added MIME subpolicy (closes: #46516)
* Added support for VISUAL (closes: #41121)
* Clarify non-dependence on /usr/local (closes: #44922)
* Modified description of mail spool locking (closes: #43651)
* Clarified wording of conffiles and configuration files (closes:
#40766, #40767)
* Changed description of release numbers (closes: #44620)
* Added changelog.html -> changelog requirement (closes: $40934)
* packaging-manual now correctly installs its docs (closes: #44643)
* The packaging manual now discusses version numbers based on dates
(closes: #17621)
* Mention ls -f for testing order in which files appear on disk (closes:
#19179)
* Change order of '.' and '+' in description of version numbers (closes:
#41095)
* s/fields/field names/ in section 4.1 of packaging manual for clarity
* Add Build-Depends-Indep: field to control file
