> It seems you have not read the amendment. There was a mechanism for
> this even in the first draft.
>
> And I would have appreciated these comments at the proposal stage, when
> we were still hammering out the thing. I even called for people with
> complicated packages to give their input when I made the proposal.
It's so long since I read it ;) Yes, some of my points were spurious
as I hadn't read the proposal in detail recently enough.
And I wasn't thinking about the debian-policy package at the time the
proposal was made ;) Maybe I was just very unlucky....
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
