On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 10:21:21AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > is actually nothing wrong with this policy. Personally, I would hope that > it always stays this way.
Ditto. > For the non-i386 archs, it makes for much less > bug reports, and more stable/consistent builds. FWIW, stability and consistency are the primary reasons I started the current convention a few years ago and those reasons are still valid today. > Perhaps the real argument should be, to have something that allows the > users to specify their own headers without libc-dev overwriting them. There is -- it's called "gcc -I". David -- David Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
