On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Given that there are now two sorts of depends, I am changing the > paragraph: > > Packages may not depend on packages with lower priority values. If > this should happen, one of the priority values will have to be > adapted. > > to read: > > Binary packages may not depend on binary packages with lower > priority values. If this should happen, one of the priority values > will have to be adapted. > > This is consistent with the changed wording in the packaging manual > introduced by the accepted proposal introducing build-time > dependencies. > > Are there any objections?
Mmm, is this change really needed? *Source* packages do not have priorities... -- "ec4eefc0f4a0d94b8fe7f2d9655dfafb" (a truly random sig)
