On 22 Sep 1999, Chris Waters wrote: > No, it implies that creating these unnecessary, redundant, and > arguably just-plain-*wrong* directories is *more* support than the > whole /opt tree needs or deserves. :-p ;-) > > Basically, while it may be a form of support, I think it's crossing > the line from support to promotion, and I don't want to promote the > use of /opt.
Sorry for the aol mode, but I fully agree. If the lack of /opt is not a bug, and no package in the system requires it, then I don't see the point in creating it. Thanks. -- "9c1e4441a36094a7a804be5136989f4e" (a truly random sig)
