On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 06:10:06PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> What I mean by that is, if we just say that policy suggests building without
> -g, then some package maintainers _will_ implement a way of getting debuggable
> binaries (or objects as your may be). We want this implementation to stay
> fairly standard, thus the suggested way should be in policy.
Why not make the suggestion a requirement. _If_ the package supports
building with debugging symbols, then it has to be implemented by querying
the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS variable.
I see a) no technical reason to allow other procedures to implement this.
b) Allowing other procedures defeats the purpose of a satndard
document.
This is why I think a suggestion is too weak. You can equally well remove
the suggestion, because I can't rely on it and have to check always if a
package follows the policy suggestion or does it differently.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org Check Key server
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org for public PGP Key
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/
