On Sat, 4 Sep 1999 21:39:56 -0700 Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >> 4) It should be completely transparent for who don't want to use it. > Huh? Can run in non-interactive-use-defaults mode if desired, if that's what > you mean. >
No; I mean that who don't want to use the configuration tool (and thus want to use Debian as a "traditional" UNIX), must be free to not use it. Personally I don't care of this, but I know people who cares... > At least 1 through 3 are already very well laid out via the debian > configuration management specification. See > http://www.debian.org/~wakkerma/config6/ > > I have a nearly-done implementation of it, too: > http://kitenet.net/programs/sshcvs/?debconf > I've read the draft, and I'm quite impressed with it; if I were known about it I wouldn't never posted my proposal. For me the important thing is to integrate a configuration tool in Debian soon (and thus get rid of the interactive scripts) not that this tool must be what I've proposed. BTW... > I don't know what kind of configuration tool you're proposing, [...] ...Have you really read the rest of my post? ;) Bye, -- Diego Dainese
