On Sun, Sep 05, 1999 at 11:15:41PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I can spot atleast a dozen spots where a general stement like > this can be stuck into the policy document. However, exhorting people > to read documentation about optrional helper packages seems like > needless bloat of the policy documents to me. > > As I said elsewhere, please create a separate proposal for > this paragraph, if you feel strongly about this. This is > controversial, the rest of your proposal is not, and is technically > quite sound (IMHO). Let us not drag the rest of the proposal into > this quagmire, since we do not have to.
Well, I didn't realize this was such a touchy subject as I don't usually read a lot of -policy. To avoid any problems with this proposal, I'll drop that section in favor of your last post. Also, thanks for correcting the bug status. Ben
