> I was thinking more along the lines of "you should use -g in the > default build, unless you provide a build that honors > BUILD_DEBUG=y". > > This keeps us from forcing current packages to move to this, in the > even that it may be downright insane to modify the build in this > way.
Hmm... I think I got the words wrong... :-( My intention is to say "either default -g or BUILD_DEBUG, but if time allows, then please move to BUILD_DEBUG". However, I don't want to consider it a bug if a package still uses -g by default. How to express that best? Roman
