On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 11:11:45PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > Thus, I would like to encourage everyone to wait until this issue is > resolved or until we agree there is no good resolution, before implementing > the current policy of making packages use /usr/share/doc.
Here's what I'll do: * I recognise the problems, so I will not upgrade to policy 3.0 any more packages * However, I will not revert the changes I already have made to my packages, unless policy is changed to say I have to. I encourage the policy group to consider it a mistake to mandate the move prematurely, and to undo the change wrt /usr/doc (not the whole FHS, though), until a solution is found. -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% "... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ..." (Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)