On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 09:55:31PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > Joseph Carter wrote: > > I think the html changelog SHOULD be there since that is its native form. > > lynx can be guaranteed to make a mess of anything more complex than a > > simple HTML file and as a result the original HTML should be provided in > > those cases. Since it's hard to deal with ifs like that in the policy, > > and since it doesn't hurt a lot, I would say it'd be good to have both. > > Why not just give the developer leeway to tell if lynx is making a mess of > things, and include the html changelog in that case, or write a better > de-html program for their changelog? We don't have to spell out every case > in policy, just give people a direction to go and enough leeway to get > there.
That's fine => -- Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux developer GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3 PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77 8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <Knghtbrd> xtifr - beware of james when he's off his medication =>
pgpUSVzNVNubB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
