Chris Waters wrote:
> Programs like dwww and dhelp will already have to be modified to look
> in both places, since users may have a mixture of old and new packages
> installed even after we make the transition to policy 4.x.
> 
> Which leaves the "user is used to '/usr/doc'" objection, which is a
> *purely* aesthetic objection, not a technical one.

No, as has been said many, MANY times before, the problem is one of
incremental upgrades. I will not describe the problem here again because I'm
quite sick of repeating myself; read any of my past postings on the subject.

-- 
see shy jo

Reply via email to