On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 10:55:57PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > >>"Darren" == Darren O Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Darren> I would say only DFSG data. Anything on our ftp site needs > Darren> to have unrestricted redistribution, really, so that we don't > Darren> have to make any checks or put ourselves at risk.... > > Why do we need any rules different than for software? I mean, > we do put non-DFSG sofware on the ftp site, and by most common > rationales given for preferring librè stuff, data is less damaging to > the community than software -- in fact, immutability (and hence > integrity) of data can even have reasonable arguments made for it. >
No reason but "ease". If you, we, the ftpmasters want to do a data/[main|contrib|non-free] on the same level as our current [main|contrib|non-free] that's ok with me. That DOES give us trees like.. stable/main/... stable/contrib/... stable/data/main/.... stable/data/contrib/.... The next logical move would be stable/main/data, stable/contrib/data and I would object to *that* move.. part of the reason for this move is to make easy mirroring/cd makeing seperations. -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< * * -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------* * Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * =========================================================================
pgp8FaEEC9JjO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
