According to Ben Gertzfield: > I think both /etc/rcS.d/ and /etc/rc.boot/ have their place, and > I know personally that /etc/rc.boot/ is far more convenient for > non-packages that need to start up once on bootup and don't > want (or care) to know about update-rc.d. > > Thoughts?
It sounds more like you want a rc.local style directory, not rc.boot. But what is so difficult about update-rc.d? It's only one line in the postinst .. (and one in prerm) Mike. -- Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers.
