On Jun 10, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > And, in any case, any solution enterred because we are at a CD > boundary is likely to last only a few months at best.
However, the CD boundary is critical for potato. And potato will be released in a few months. Furthermore, putting spillover source and spillover binaries on the same disc is a non-starter if we want to preserve the current practice of making the source CDs non-arch-specific. I can see contrib and oldlibs (binary and source) on a CD#3 though, which might let us get away with a 2 CD upgrade from slink. So I amend the proposal to drop "require." Chris -- ============================================================================= | Chris Lawrence | You have a computer. Do you have Linux? | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.linux-m68k.org/index.html | | | | | Grad Student, Pol. Sci. | Join the party that opposed the CDA | | University of Mississippi | http://www.lp.org/ | =============================================================================
