Hi,

Manoj, in your message to which this is a reply (see In-Reply-To header), you
write:

> Date:    06 Jun 1999 11:12:10 CDT
> To:      debian-policy@lists.debian.org
> From:    Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: weekly policy summary
> 
> Hi,
> >>"Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>  Wichert> I'm not sure I like this one. This would mean that main is
>  Wichert> no longer self-contained, which I would consider a bad
>  Wichert> thing.
> 
>         This is a matter of semantics, but I consider main to be
>  composed of main-US and main-nonUS. Thus, in my eyes, the policy
>  proposal does not cause main to be not self contained (it makes CD's
>  legaly sold in the US not self consistent, and that too is bad, but
>  for other reasons).

I am agreeing to disagree here: it's my opinion that things that are
distributable anywhere belong in main, nothing which is not. Having 
said that, I also think that the things in non-US -should- be 
distributable (i.e., I -wish- they were.)

-Jim, who wonders if he finally has a vote now :)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to