n May 21, "Karl M. Hegbloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> `minicom' is group owned by `uucp'. > Marco> This is wrong. BTW, it's not even sgid, so I see no reason > Marco> to chown the binary to the uucp group. > Should it be `chgrp dialout', with o-x? Or root.root, o+x, and rely > on device permissions for access control, so that a machine could > have perhaps a ttyS for a serial line, and another for a dialout > modem or something? Is that real? The second way.
> The question is, do we really need `dialout', `dip' AND `uucp'? You > tell me and we'll both know. I'll listen to more experienced advice. Yes, we do. They have different meanings. -- ciao, Marco
