> Ok, that's a doable option, though it'll be a lot simpler to just make a
> script that traverses the archive, examines every .deb file, pulls the du
> infomation out of them and generates the master file. That doesn't require
> modifying every package and adding yet another file that must be uploaded
> (and aren't byhand files installed by hand?)

This could be done along with the contents scan, it would take a bit of
coding to do as you would have to also implement caching and probably a
custom tar reader..
 
> But how is putting the info in this master file any better than putting it
> in Packages? The master file needs to be kept synced with the Packages file,
> so it still must be downloaded.

Probably because nobody is ever going to download it? :> I can see it
interesting some people but not everyone. Besides, putting it seperate
means we can maintainer the format of the packages file without undo
complication.

APT already has a nice mechanism to download multiple index files (ie the
Release files).

Jason

Reply via email to