Your message dated 07 May 1999 13:26:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
debian-policy_2.5.1.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 1999 11:48:21 +0000
Received: (qmail 31998 invoked from network); 14 Mar 1999 11:48:20 -0000
Received: from mv.mv.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 1999 11:48:20 -0000
Received: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mv.mv.com (8.8.8/mem-971025) id GAA16883 for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 06:48:19 -0500 (EST)
From: "Robert C. Henney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian policy typo
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 06:48:18 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Package: Debian Policy Manual
Version: version 2.5.0.0, 1998-10-30
Regarding the debian policy online at the URL:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch3.html#s-sysvinit
The policy document contains the line below that shows "default" as
the second argument being passed to the update-rc.d script.
However, examination of the update-rc.d script as well as the
manual page for the script appears to indicate that update-rc.d is
actually looking for "defaults", and not "default".
update-rc.d package default >/dev/null
^ ^
--
Rob @ MV Staff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(603) 629-0000
"If yer gonna smoke, catch on fire or something."
