Chris Waters wrote: > I would like to know more about the pros and cons of the proposal > before participating in any sort of "consensus". My impression has > been that libtool is mostly not needed on Linux-based systems. So, > I'm a little dubious about the idea of requiring it in -dev packages. > But I'm open to debate.
I think the proposal was just to include .la files in -dev packages if the .la files are produced by the build process. I didn't read it as mandating that everything use libtool. -- see shy jo
