On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 04:25:10PM +0300, Fabrizio Polacco wrote:
> > /mnt is for temporary mounts; I do not consider /cdrom to be a temporary
> > mount, myself. IMHO, /mnt/* is an ugly Red Hatism.
> 
> /mnt is *only* for temporary mounts, and should be left into local sysadm 
> domain, as it is for /usr/local, it has already been said.
> 
> I agree that populating / with "random" mountpoints (what for who has
> two CD drivers, or two floppyes, and maybe a zip/jazz?) is ugly.
> 
> I would prefere to use /var/mnt/* for this purpose. 
> It mimics the distinction between /tmp and /var/tmp , and /var is
> warranteed to be local and writable.

I like this.  I'm not going to necessarily consider this something that
is going to be done on a Debian-wide scale (though I think it should be
personally), but I'm about to do it on MY system.  Thank you for the
suggestion.

(and here's to the hope, be it perhaps small, that this suggestion will
become the default..  Create symlinks in / to them if you want--I don't
care.  =>  This is a Good Thing and we should seriously consider doing
it)

--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>            Debian GNU/Linux developer
PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE            The Source Comes First!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"my biggest problem with RH (and especially RH contrib packages) is that
they DON'T have anything like our policy.  That's one of the main reasons
why their packages are so crappy and broken.  Debian has the teamwork
side of building a distribution down to a fine art."

Attachment: pgpCpiwdOCEM0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to