reassign 34223 packaging-manual thanks Well, whatever you want Santiago. This is an essential APT feature, I will not remove it just because it offends you.
Jason On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > reopen 34223 > severity 34223 normal > retitle 34223 apt and packaging manual are in contradiction > thanks > [..] > > Anyway, by reading debian-testing, it seems APT has been modified so that > the user has to type the entire bible before removing an essential > package. > > Well, I admit this is very "imaginative" as a workaround. > > However, the packaging manual does not allow it yet > (at least not the *letter* of it). > > Therefore, I still see here a contradiction between what packaging manual > says a dselect method should do, and what apt actually does. > > I'm reopening this bug since a contradiction still remains (for this > reason I'm doing a retitle as well). If you think this contradiction > should be solved by changing the packaging manual, please reassign this > bug to the packaging-manual package (which is maintained by the > debian-policy mailing list), I will not object to you making this > reassign, but I think it should be you the one to do it. > > Thanks. > > -- > "c8592afc434b887238bf4ea68116e285" (a truly random sig) > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >