On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Santiago Vila wrote:
> > The bug:
> > =======
> >
> > The /usr/doc/debian-policy/virtual-package-names-list.text.gz file says:
> >
> > awk Anything providing suitable /usr/bin/{awk,nawk}
> >
> > So: Is "nawk" an approved virtual package name or not? It appears in the
> > right-hand side but not in the left-hand side!
>
> I don't see the problem. awk is a virtual package that provides the
> binaries /usr/bin/awk and /usr/bin/nawk, both of them new awks.
Do you mean that a single line in the list of virtual packages is enough
to state as policy that "every awk should provide the binary /usr/bin/nawk"?
If this were the case, it should be clearly written in the policy,
not in a single line in the virtual packages list. Hence the bug.
(But I think it should not be the case, hence my proposal).
Thanks.
--
"894e98d29f31a2e0bda41dac5d491256" (a truly random sig)
