On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Santiago Vila wrote: > > Is this to be considered "distribution-wise"? > > i.e. Is this to be applied to hamm, slink, potato, in an independent way? > > I think so, because packages that may be required in release N could > be obsolete in release N+1 and deserve a lower priority there. > > Wichert (wondering if he missed something here)
Thanks for answering. So: what's the right priority for a library in slink for which an important package in slink depends on? -- "5e8f0217751d1f8d6f855fbd12863082" (a truly random sig)
