Previously Guy Maor wrote: > b looks like a reasonable solution, and would not be hard to > implement. Of course, as you said, if only a handful of packages are > affected, then it's less work to do c.
Of course if we reed the Debian lessions (liw posted a URL for that recently) we know we have to consider that things grow in the future. It's not totally unreasonable to expect Linux and HURD will not be the only two systems in the future so we'll end up implementing (b) anyway then. Maybe we can get an entry in the Guiness book of records for the archive with the most symlinks? Wichert. -- ============================================================================== This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman. E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgp3gZjFbjX1V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
