Hi,
>>"Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jules> My gut instincts tell me that encouraging people to use
Jules> dpkg-buildpackage is *good* since this means we can
Jules> incorporate future ideas like this one directly there.
I still think that the functionality should be pulled out, and
dpkg-buildpackage merely invoke the new binary, just so people are
not straight jacketed into using dpkg-buildpackage if they do not
want to.
I would not want this functionality pulled into
dpkg-buildpackage, and then have dpkg-buildpackage made even more
complex to allow invocation of other targets; I would rather that one
be allowed to modify the rules file so that one may call individual
targets from the rules file directly.
Jules> We should simply make dpkg-buildpackage more flexible (so
Jules> that, for example, in the event you don't want a whole build,
Jules> you can specify a target - if we don't already have this
Jules> functionality).
*Chuckle*. Am I the only on here that remembers
dpkg-buildpackage as a new fangled thing? Traditionally, one did it
all by hand (invoking the targets in ./debian/rules, I mean). I think
if one needs to call a few targets, one may invode ./debian/rules
directly.
manoj
--
Wonder is the feeling of a philosopher, and philosophy begins in
wonder. Socrates, quoting Plato [Huh? That's like Johnson quoting
Boswell]
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
