On Tue, Jan 05, 1999 at 06:51:52PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Raul Miller wrote:
> > I agree (as long as new packages which depend on other new packages
> > are acceptable).
> 
> Would adding something like the following to section 2.3 be enough?
> 
>   Packages may have a relation with other packages through Pre-depends,
>   Depends, Recommends, Suggests, Conflicts and Replaces. If a package
>   declares such a releation to another package, that other package has
>   to exist in one of the sections of the same release. It can either be
>   a real package, a virtual package provided by another package or a
>   virtual package from the list of virtual packages.

This says that a package cannot conflict with an old version of another
package. That is bad!


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD              [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.   http://hamish.home.ml.org

Attachment: pgp0myrkNH8OK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to