Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> As far as I'm concerned this leaves undecided only the following
> question: how can we best organise this and what should the result
> look like ?  So far we have seen two proposals:
>   i.  Simply have them side by side, with some kind of way of making
>       obsolete sources disappear eventually
>   ii. Some arrangement with .nmu files
> 
> It seems to me that (ii) will be slow to design and implement.  We
> must therefore implement (i) immediately.  It is therefore my view
> that we should file a bug against (or reassign this one to)
> ftp.debian.org to have this implemented.

Well, I still like the idea of a NMU source maintainer, who has
control over directories named dists/*/*/source/*/NMU, and who
manually coordinates those sources that are currently sent to the
BTS. (so this person wouldn't handle all NMUs, just porters') People
really should be creating multi-platform source, and when they don't
the result should be ugly.  But this requires time to implement.

If we decide to go with (i) right away, will Guy (or whoever) be
calling for old orig.tar.gz and diff.gz files?  I _think_ I still have 
them.

Reply via email to