Hi,
>>"Darren" == Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> On 13-Oct-98 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I am inclined to trust the current method of having a human
>> actually do rejects. The afore mentioned human may, of course, use
>> the services of lintian in deciding whether or not to reject the
>> package; I would be inclined to support a policy violation being
>> sufficient cause for rejection.
>>
Darren> I was talking with one such human in IRC today and he basicly
Darren> said he'd get chewed out since there is no policy to reject
Darren> packages because they break policy...
By all means, then, we should create at least a convention
that lintian errors are grounds for rejection. I would put it at
least in the developers-reference, and into policy as well if that is
deemed necessary.
manoj
--
QOTD: "When she hauled ass, it took three trips."
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
