On Sat, Aug 15, 1998 at 08:14:34AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote: > > >> Actually, I am going to make a stand about our Hypocrisy; > > >> anything that you have said also applies to Licenses. You want to > > >> throw things like the FHS and others out of main, you have to throw > > >> out the DFSG, the social contract, and GPL etc out as well > > > > Joseph> I don't think they should be, any of them. I don't think the > > Joseph> DFSG counts anyway since it's not a license. Licenses are > > Joseph> not change-able for a reason. That's IP issues, not free > > Joseph> software issues IMO. A standards document should be allowed > > Joseph> to be unmodifyable, same with a license. > > > > Joseph> Am I making any sense? > > > > To me you are. And, I suppose, you would agree to creating a > > verbatim section, and putting all these unmodifiable documents in > > there? > > I understand it? > main > contrib > verbatim > non-free > > Is this right? > > verbatim only for standard, law? > or documentation too? > or software too? > > I agree with a verbatim distribution only for text (include documentation) > but not for code.
I don't see the point of a verbatim dist.. Perhaps a verbatim section in main...?
pgpjeOQGG2SOa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
