Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Umm, why is the new elisp package dependent on emacs if it
> really needs emacsen methods? As far as I can see, most of the new
> packages either depend on emacsen-common, or explicitly on
> x?emacs{19,20}, so they would not be upgraded an a system that does
> not have the new emacsen system.
Umm, I think you misunderstood me. I was trying to explain the
problem you're talking about, i.e. why 'emacsen' exists instead of
just having all the flavors provide 'emacs'. The scenario I gave was
a sort of "what would break if there was no 'emacsen'" thing...
Personally, I have no problems with the current emacs setup... I think
it's quite a nice idea, actually, and yet another nice little feature
Debian has to set it apart from the rest of the pack :)
--Rob
--
Rob Tillotson N9MTB Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
