Fabrizio Polacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There is no such need between hamm and slink, so I think that using > the usual convention for NMU (package_1-2.1 ) would be enough.
Can we please not overload the NMU convention? If we do it makes it very hard to determine when the maintainer last uploaded a package, making it nigh on impossible to track down absentee maintainers other than by hand. And absentee maintainers become more of a problem by the day. -- James ~Yawn And Walk North~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
