Guy Maor writes: > Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This sounds like a mistake to me. > > I agree with Bob. The section 1 manpages should be in the appropriate > package.
I second this. There is already a problem with translated section 1 manpages being in manpage-<language> rather than in the relevant binary packages, let's not extend the problem to english manpages too ! As an example, with lpr.1 being part of manpages-fr, and lprng installed, I have `man lpr' giving the translated manpage for the traditionnal lpr, and `LC_ALL=C man lpr' giving the english manpage for lprng's lpr... I think we should instead make it policy to include all section 1 manpages, including translated ones, into the relevant binary packages. I can see that as a meaningful goal for slink. -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer, alt-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | support Debian GNU/Linux: debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | more powerful, more stable ! http://www.a2points.com/homepage/3475232 | Check <http://www.debian.org/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
