[ Not in a huge hurry to get back into this discussion, but there are a couple of inaccuarcies here ]
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Debian QA group: The QA group is not a replacement for a > maintainer. (I verified this by asking James Troup, who's, AFAIK, a > member of the QA group.) Umm, nope, sorry if I gave that impression, part of my problem with the QA group is that there is no clearly define QA group, it's just some nebulous entity, tremulously defined by the subscription list of the associated mailing list. Personally I think the QA group needs to be reevaluated and made to work or it should disappear. [Not that I have the time to get involved myself, which is why it's nothing more than a thought] > [EMAIL PROTECTED], new-maintainer: These are not _packages_! Hmm, well, you can file bugs against bugs.debian.org. So I think even more than new-maintainer a lot of the same issues apply (responsibility, communication, software to maintain (debbugs), etc.). > (There is only the new keyring package waiting in Incoming/.) Actually, it's not anywhere yet, I haven't finished packaging it, thanks to YAWN *mutter*. -- James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
