On Sun, Apr 19, 1998 at 12:48:37PM -0700, Guy Maor wrote: > James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Personally I think this package could go into hamm > > For what it's worth, I also think it's fine to go into hamm.
For what it's worth, I also think that it is fine to go into hamm. (Yes, I know that Christian has spoken. I haven't read his e-mail message in full yet, but I still think it is fine to go into Hamm.) Resolve it as you guys may, but don't waste time on this kind of minor matters because of "The Policy". Let's get the bugs fixed and get Hamm out. Anthony -- Anthony Fok Tung-Ling Civil and Environmental Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Alberta, Canada [EMAIL PROTECTED] Keep smiling! *^_^* Come visit Our Lady of Victory Camp -- http://olvc.home.ml.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
