On Sun, Apr 05, 1998 at 04:35:09PM +0200, Christian Schwarz wrote: > On Tue, 17 Mar 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > IMO the new libtool's behaviour (forced -rpath and no inter-library > > dependencies) is seriously broken. The Debian maintainer should lobby > > with the upstream author to get if fixed (or, at the very least, provide > > options so that Linux users can specify --no-rpath > > --inter-library-dependencies-please).. > > I fully agree. > > Could the libtool maintainer please comment on this? (E.g., is the > upstream maintainer willing to do the changes?)
The upstream libtool maintainer is aware of the inter-libarary dependencies issue and has a webpage about it (http://www.profitpress.com/libtool/deplibs.html). It does not however look like he has made a decision about it yet. Ray -- UNFAIR Term applied to advantages enjoyed by other people which we tried to cheat them out of and didn't manage. See also DISHONESTY, SNEAKY, UNDERHAND and JUST LUCKY I GUESS. - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]