>>>>> On 16 Mar 1998 12:48:29 -0800, Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mark> Recently a lot of bugs have been filed against packages, saying Mark> that xpm files should be put in /usr/X11R6/include/pixmaps Mark> (IIRC). Mark> I think this is a bad idea. If a pixmap is intended for use Mark> internally by that application and is unlikely to be of use to Mark> anyone else, it shouldn't clutter up a global pixmaps Mark> directory. It seems to me that the only pixmaps that should be Mark> in there are those that are intended to be used by other Mark> programs or by users (as part of their window manager or Mark> desktop configuration). Ben> I agree. And this Michael Bramer has submitted this bug twice on Ben> the nethack package, and has ignored my requests for more Ben> information about the bug. It's time to close these bugs, or Ben> come up with some sort of policy (why, though?) about them. Twice on xemacs as well. I just closed mine. Dres -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @ http://www.dimensional.com/~dres | Linux is cool! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
