Joey asked for more input, so here is some. On Sun, 22 Feb 1998, Joey Hess wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Joey, do not remove the scores file, just zero size it. > > Hm, ok. > > > the files have group read permissions, OK? In the postinst, you can touch > > a file, set the permission, and the games *ALL* work. Try it. > > Ok, I belive you. That still doesn't address the other thing that's come up > about some games having some scores in their default score file for you to > try to beat. > > > Extra files: 56K + dosemu image > > + about 2 MB (and up) of lambdacore database. Yes, few systems have this > installed, but it's subject to the same arguments, and it would bloat /etc > to no end. I would hate to see the lambdacore database forced into /etc! (I'm one of those systems that, from time to time, has a lambdamoo running on the system) > > > advantages of all local mods in /etc: > > a) only need to backup /etc > > It's not much harder to back up /etc + var. Moving all conffiles out of /var > will not get rid of all the files in /var that you might want to back up, or > even a large percentage of them. (For example, I have this thing about > backing up /var/lib/dpkg/ and /var/www/mrtg/. None of that is conffiles.) > > > c) configuration files are all supposed to be in /etc > > follows current policy > > But most of these files we're talking about are not traditional unix > configuration files (ie, text files that can be edited with any editor). And > many of them will never be edited by anyone (ie, all the games score files) > > They are still data that changes. They belong in /var. Yes. > > > d) available on system startup > > /var is mounted well before any of the programs in question are run. > > > As to the conffile not being a configuration file, I think you > > are wrong on that issue (you doubtless feel I am wrong). I think this > > is a time for some deadlock breakage to occur. > > Yes, at least it's time to get some one else's input. If anyone else cares > and if we haven't scared them off. > It has always been my understanding that a conffile was a special class file with respect to dpkg and nothing more. It has special rules for replacement, but every time I asked Ian J. I was told that a conffile was not the same thing as a config file. If the policy is intended to dictate that all conffiles are config files then I am willing to say that the policy is broken. > > I think we have reached a point where neither one of us is > > saying anything new. > > Yes. > > > If you think policy is restrictive, get it changed. > This argument has been one of interpretation. This is always going to be a problem with the policy. If we choose to live and die based on the words in the policy manual rather than making a reasoned decisions, when necessary, that potentially violate policy, the distribution will suffer. Waiting is, Dwarf -- _-_-_-_-_ Author of "The Debian Linux User's Guide" _-_-_-_-_-_- aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 656-9769 Flexible Software 11000 McCrackin Road e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tallahassee, FL 32308 _-_-_-_-_-_- If you don't see what you want, just ask _-_-_-_-_-_-_-