Christian Schwarz writes: > The FHS fully supports /usr/share and we already have decided to implement
Great. > the FHS in Debian 2.1 (at least partially--see below) but stay with FSSTND > for Debian 2.0. (The changes would be too much to get hamm out in time.) implementing FHS would take time, but recommending /usr/share, with compat links, for all new uploads will make things even better IMHO. > However, I don't have any problems (and I think this is FSSTND compliant > also) with packages using /usr/share instead of /usr/lib if this doesn't > break other packages. Yes, it is FSSTND compliant, as long as there are links to all dirs under /usr/share, and that no app uses /usr/share directly. How do you understand that ? Should I set up /usr/lib/kbd/* links to /usr/share/ again ? -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer, alt-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | support Debian GNU/Linux: debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | more powerful, more stable ! http://www.a2points.com/homepage/3475232 | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
