> Santiago Vila wrote: > > Hi! > > > Marco Budde has asked me to add dhelp support in debmake (he even sent me > > patches), but there is a doc-base package planned for Debian 2.1. Since it > > seems that doc-base and dhelp will have very similar goals, I don't think > > it is a good idea to support dhelp (through debmake or not) at this > > I think you should support it. Please remember all maintainer should > use HTML for documentation (see policy). But it's a very bad idea to > browse hundrets of HTML documents without an index and a search engine. > That's the reason why we should use such a system in hamm.
Would a reason be that we already have dwww/menu that does exactly this? with dwww/menu, you'll get a www page (one or more, depending on your taste) that indexes all registered www pages. The registered documents go in a nested structure, etc, and the final look of the www page that contains all pages can very easily be modified. What adds dhelp that dwww/menu doesn't already have? -- joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Potentially offensive files, part 5: /dev/random. `head -c 4 /dev/random` may print 4-letter words (once every approx 4e8 tries).
