> Could somebody please explain the rationale for having *all* > /etc/init.d/* scripts as conffiles?
They are as conffiles as autoexec.bat in DOS is. (uh.. was that good English?)
> Could somebody please explain the rationale for having *all* > /etc/init.d/* scripts as conffiles?
They are as conffiles as autoexec.bat in DOS is. (uh.. was that good English?)