-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Sat, 25 Oct 1997, Ian Jackson wrote:
> No. It is not for us to determine what the upstream version number > scheme should be (though we can say what we might like), and since it > is our policy to try to keep the upstream version number intact as > much as possible it is NOT a bug if this results in us using a version > number with a 2-digit year. "we might like" -> wishlist -> bug of type wishlist. Therefore it is a "bug" in the sense that it may be reported through the bug reporting system. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: latin1 iQCVAgUBNFMfDSqK7IlOjMLFAQGRswP/V6jRn1TfwBy+44UV+9VrNhsf5jFEcjEM 51Cc++omWfml9gyQax2fqnvHuDO0mpUimuoiWTGlwrD3wXxojb0s6WHSyD/mNQw0 Jq1VF3WfKJE36TAijnALJhANih7j+xkR2qR+5O3XOwdc2ZLPGbNb3iFVEu/d8jxN d9R9ym/SV2A= =KxtU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
