On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 07:19:14PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:45:01 -0500, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > There seems to be no consistency in debian about the default > > directory used by tftpd servers. I've tried all three: > > > server directory > > tftpd /boot > > atftpd /tftpboot > > tftpd-hpa /var/lib/tftpboot > > > It would be easier to try out different servers if they all used the > > same directory by default. It would also be nice if that directory > > was FHS compliant, which at least /tftpboot is not. I don't know if > > /boot is; /var/lib/tftpboot is fine. > > Seems like /srv/tftpd is the consensus.
Rather /srv/tftp ? (like /srv/ftp, /srv/www,/src/cvs) ? Here the relevant part of the FHS 2.3 which introduce /srv: The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is unspecified as there is currently no consensus on how this should be done. One method for structuring data under /srv is by protocol, eg. ftp, rsync, www, and cvs. On large systems it can be useful to structure /srv by administrative context, such as /srv/physics/www, /srv/compsci/cvs, etc. This setup will differ from host to host. Therefore, no program should rely on a specific subdirectory structure of /srv existing or data necessarily being stored in /srv. However /srv should always exist on FHS compliant systems and should be used as the default location for such data. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]