Hi Nilesh,
Yeah, I completely agree. I was thinking between applying for a DM+ for
porterboxes and then DD non-up but having to do them multiple times
and then applying for an uploading again soon after that felt redundant to
me so I decided to choose the DD uploading route as I had already been
a maintainer before.
I would be happy to let the timeline for the application lapse while I
submit more substantial code contributions to the Debian project before
reapplying
for the DD uploading post directly.

Regards,
Kartik



On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:46 AM Nilesh Patra <nil...@debian.org> wrote:

> On 23 Jul, 2022 Kartik Kulkarni wrote:
> > I have been involved in the Debian project for a while now and I had not
> required a full account for the rare uploads I do and for which I could ask
> for sponsorship. But after having a few discussions at Debconf, I realised
> that being a DD doesn't just have the benefits of having the upload rights
> but having the rights to give their opinions and vote for what goes on in
> the Debian project, for example the general resolutions. I think after
> being a volunteer for a while, I now want to be a fully fledged [...]
>
> With all due respect -
>
> Then in such a case you should likely apply for a non-uploading one. You
> will gain the ability
> to vote in GRs and voice your opinion. At the same time, DD-NU also have
> the same right as DMs, so you
> would still be in a position to upload your stuff.
> And when you feel that you have done more packaging work, and would like
> to do more uploads, you can always
> apply for uploading one.
>
> Being an uploading DD also means (among other things that you wrote) that
> they should be able to have unrestricted
> access to upload. As for you, as far as I can see your last upload was on
> Sep 02, 2020 which is ~2 years from
> now, and also shortly after you became a DM, and I don't see any uploads
> post that. So I somehow am confused with the said
> status change req.
>
> Let me know if you think otherwise.
>
> --
> Best,
> Nilesh
>

Reply via email to