Hi, On 28/01/18 16:56, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 04:37:36PM +0000, James Cowgill wrote: >> Now that salsa is stable, I am going to start migrating things over. I > > Thank you for doing the work! > >> One other change from the proposed plan is the addition of the >> "tagpending" webhook described here: >> https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc#Dealing_with_Debian_BTS_from_commit_messages > > Yes please. > Thank you for adding that. (btw, you didn't push that change into the > git repo of your script)
Should be pushed now (along with some other stuff). >> I am also taking this opportunity to trim the repositories on alioth. >> The repositories below will be omitted from the initial import (but will >> still all be made read only). > > Can you please *move* the repositories that have been moved, instead of > just making them read-only? moving them to a MOVED_TO_SALSA directory > should make the situation pretty clear. I'm assuming we are going to > remove them at some point (if nothing because I'd like to help avoid > forcing the alioth admins to keep a huge snapshot once the host goes > down). > Of course, I'm assuming you are also going to open a MR to add http > redirects from anonscm to salsa. That seems reasonable. I'll move the repositories after the redirector MR is merged. >> # Incorrect Package Naming >> My script requires repo name = source package name at the moment so >> these will be omitted. The pd-* repositories are special because they >> need to be put in a separate group. Should they intentionally not have >> the correct name - ie should "pd-lua" become "pd/lua" or "pd/pd-lua"? > > Please, let's keep repo name = source package name. So the package > 'pd-lua' should have a repo 'pd-lua', wherever group it is in. I think so, but I'll wait to see what umlaeute says because he pretty much owns all the pd-* packages. Thanks, James
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
