On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:41:07PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > Le decadi 20 nivôse, an CCXXII, Fabian Greffrath a écrit : > > Honestly - apart from libdvdcss - what benefit does d-m.o still bring > > nowadays? The majority of packages I find there are redundant forks of > > packages already in Debian, mostly players and codecs. > > Sorry to bring that back up, but I decided I finally did not want to let it > slide. > > I do not know if that is what you are trying to do, but calling something a > "redundant fork" is a good way to start the troll here. Especially > "redundant", it is very derogatory. Having that kind of noise on this
Look up the meaning of the word redundant in the dictionary, does it mention anything about being derogatory. -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140118111615.GK5651@tal
